顶配
复制代码 跑分
复制代码 普通
复制代码 跑分
复制代码
这个脚本 查了下天梯gold 的性能强
复制代码
复制代码
单核心性能gold强(2243-1604)/1604=40% |
网友回复:
注册: gold 这么渣的吗?震惊
Cllp: 还是三毛的Silver强
jiuqimax: mjj都在刷这个,挤一起了
svd1983: 一堆刷的肯定炸啊
nico: 顶配居然还不如普通的?
天行九歌: 没刷到的路过,我发现网络好的,一般不是配置高的,配置高的网络都一般般
laogui: 并没有,中配的感觉就是比低配的U,打开网页快
moowee: ======================================================================== BYTE UNIX Benchmarks (Version 5.1.3) System: ptr.ruvds.com: GNU/Linux OS: GNU/Linux — 4.14.175 — #1 SMP Sat Apr 4 21:58:09 HKT 2020 Machine: x86_64 (x86_64) Language: en_US.utf8 (charmap=”UTF-8″, collate=”UTF-8″) CPU 0: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2658 v4 @ 2.30GHz (4589.4 bogomips) x86-64, MMX, Physical Address Ext, SYSENTER/SYSEXIT, SYSCALL/SYSRET 21:52:58 up 9 days, 19:50, 1 user, load average: 0.55, 0.14, 0.05; runlevel 3 ———————————————————————— Benchmark Run: 二 5月 19 2020 21:52:58 – 22:21:12 1 CPU in system; running 1 parallel copy of tests Dhrystone 2 using register variables 22955824.8 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples) Double-Precision Whetstone 3861.8 MWIPS (9.9 s, 7 samples) Execl Throughput 3083.7 lps (29.5 s, 2 samples) File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 253974.6 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples) File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 68458.7 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples) File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 774341.5 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples) Pipe Throughput 372682.4 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples) Pipe-based Context Switching 104094.7 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples) Process Creation 7728.8 lps (30.0 s, 2 samples) Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 3477.3 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples) Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 478.3 lpm (60.1 s, 2 samples) System Call Overhead 255841.3 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples) System Benchmarks Index Values BASELINE RESULT INDEX Dhrystone 2 using register variables 116700.0 22955824.8 1967.1 Double-Precision Whetstone 55.0 3861.8 702.1 Execl Throughput 43.0 3083.7 717.1 File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 3960.0 253974.6 641.4 File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 1655.0 68458.7 413.6 File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 5800.0 774341.5 1335.1 Pipe Throughput 12440.0 372682.4 299.6 Pipe-based Context Switching 4000.0 104094.7 260.2 Process Creation 126.0 7728.8 613.4 Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 42.4 3477.3 820.1 Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 6.0 478.3 797.2 System Call Overhead 15000.0 255841.3 170.6 ======== System Benchmarks Index Score 592.5 500多分,我说啥了
superneed: 我华为云的1c2g1m e5-26 性能实际体验比另一家的gold65xx高 只能说母鸡性能不能等同于小鸡=-=
注册: 好u多超,烂u少超,商人不可能给你多少好处